16s chimera checking tool

Then follow the Pipeline Initial Processing tutorial to begin processing your data. The sequence files produced by the initial processing tool need to be checked for chimeras. For this task we recommend using one of two software packages freely available online. The results will be emailed to you usually within a couple of hours.

However, the concentration of 16S reads in this data set was very low 0. Ultimately, the small number of 16S sequences generated by the WGS approach suggests that pursuing WGS methods as an alternative to directed 16S sequence surveys to specifically mine 16S data is neither efficient nor cost effective.

Perhaps, as costs of sequencing continue to plummet, WGS methods will become a viable alternative to directed 16S sequence surveys. Until then, optimizing PCR conditions to mitigate chimera amplification and leveraging tools such as CS to flag suspect sequences should help minimize the impact of such artifacts on related microbiota research. It is also important to note that chimeras are only one source of diversity artifacts. Even with filtering of chimeras, the appearance of unique sequence clusters occurs at a high rate when compared with known sample diversity.

This is particularly true for reads generated using pyrosequencing as compared with the Sanger-generated reads; thus, the effects of sequencing error and other anomalies cannot be ignored Quince et al. Additional studies leveraging controlled mock communities should help clarify insights into the true diversity represented within the rare biosphere. Petrosino et al. To generate the even and staggered mock communities, DNA from each organism was mixed according to the calculated 16S concentration.

In the even community, the 16S concentration from all organisms was normalized so that each organism contributed a calculated number of , 16S molecules to each amplification reaction.

In the staggered mock community, species were present in one of four concentrations calculated to contribute either 10 3 , 10 4 , 10 5 , or 10 6 16S molecules per reaction.

All three PCR products were normalized to the same molecule concentration 1. Emulsion PCR and sequencing were performed according to the manufacturer's specifications. Because of sequencing bias likely due to hairpin formations with the adapter and forward 16S primer, we restricted our analyses to sequences derived from the reverse 16S primer.

Counts of pyrosequenced reads analyzed are included in Supplemental Table S1. A query sequence was aligned to a NAST-formatted reference sequence or set of NAST-formatted reference sequences , and gap insertion was restricted to the query sequence in generating the global optimal alignment. End-gaps in the aligned query sequence were not penalized because the subject sequences were usually partial , and regions of the query sequence that extended beyond the boundaries of the NAST-formatted reference sequence s were excluded in order to maintain the fixed width; this was particularly useful in the case where the query included unaligned vector or low-quality sequence at its ends, which in many cases became excluded from the resulting alignment.

When a query was aligned to a set of multiple reference sequences, a profile was constructed based on the multiple reference sequences, and alignment scores were computed by summing all match and mismatch scores within a position of the alignment. Pre-existing gap characters in the NAST-formatted reference sequences were not penalized when aligned to a gap inserted in the query.

The global dynamic programming algorithm with a fixed width profile P and unaligned query sequence Q was defined by the following recursion:. The optimal scoring alignment was chosen as max[ F i , j ], where i was the position of the last position in the NAST alignment profile.

The query sequence was aligned to this profile as described above. Generating a NAST alignment for a single query sequence, including performing the reference sequence database search, takes on the order of one second per sequence on an average desktop computer. A large overlap exists between the sequences derived from these two sources, and so CD-HIT Li and Godzik was used to retrieve the longest nonredundant reference sequence requiring The resulting reference database consisted of sequences, corresponding to type strains, and the remaining derived from complete or draft genome sequences.

The complete taxonomy of each sequence, including domain, phylum, class, order, family, and genus was predicted using the RDP Bayesian classifier Wang et al. Simulated chimeric 16S sequences were constructed by joining two immediately adjacent segments of a pair of NAST-formatted reference sequences.

A random breakpoint was selected from the range of the NAST alignment columns between the positions corresponding to and in the E. At least 50 nucleotide characters G, A, T, or C were required on each side of the breakpoint. The disparate sequence regions from each side of the breakpoint were joined to create a simulated chimera. The pair of reference sequences from which the chimera was derived is referred to as the parents. The divergence between the parents is referred to as the chimera-pair divergence.

Pairs of parental reference sequences to be joined into a chimera were randomly selected based on differences at each level of their taxonomy intra-phylum chimeras down to intra-genus chimeras. Smaller length simulated chimeras were constructed similarly according to the targeted unaligned sequence lengths. Simulated sequence divergence was performed by randomly selecting a position within the NAST-formatted chimera sequence and introducing a mismatch, insertion, or deletion, as specified.

Point mutations were applied until reaching the targeted level of sequence divergence, disallowing multiple mutations at the same site. Mutated positions were selected based on a uniform random distribution provided by the rand function in PERL, thus effectively using the Jukes-Cantor one-parameter model of molecular sequence evolution with no heterogeneity of rates across sites.

It was not possible for us to examine the accuracy of the GreenGenes Bellerophon web service with our test regime due to its special formatting requirements, such as requiring NAST alignments and associated data generated by the webserver as a prerequisite to chimera checking. Instead, we reimplemented a GreenGenes Bellerophon utility based on the published algorithm description and set parameters according to default settings on the GreenGenes website.

An abridged set of sequences from the test regime was submitted to the web service for processing and the results were highly comparable to our reimplemented version Supplemental Fig. The top 10 reference database sequences were retrieved in NAST format. Each pair of the top 10 matching reference sequences were considered as potential parents of the candidate chimeric query sequence. The NAST-formatted query and each pair of potential parents were examined separately using the GreenGenes Bellerophon algorithm: The columns of the NAST multiple alignment of the three sequences two parents and query that exclusively contain gap characters were first removed.

Given a candidate chimeric query sequence Q and two putative parents of the chimera P 1 and P 2 and a putative chimeric breakpoint with bp windows to the left W l and right W r , the percent identities were computed between each pair of sequences within each window.

A divergence ratio was computed as the average percent identity PerID between the two windows corresponding to the query and a putative chimera, divided by the percent identity between the two nonchimeric parents:. If, at any step, the divergence ratio meets a minimum threshold of 1.

The publicly available version of the Pintail chimera detection software is a graphical interface-driven software intended for manual analysis of potentially chimeric sequences.

It was not designed for use in a high-throughput setting. In addition, the available software was not suited for use with NAST-formatted alignments. To evaluate the Pintail algorithm and to obtain a version of the software that was both compatible with NAST-alignments and for use in a high-throughput environment, we reimplemented the algorithm as previously described Ashelford et al. The top matching reference sequence and the query sequence, both in NAST format, were compared using the Pintail algorithm, using our implementation that we named WigeoN.

A mask was applied to the NAST alignment to include only those columns that correspond to residues in the E. The global sequence divergence between the resulting reference and query alignment was computed.

A window of columns of the multiple alignments was slid from left to right with a step of 25 columns, and the sequence divergence within each window was calculated.

The standard deviation of sequence divergence among all windows was computed as the deviation from expected DE value. The distribution of DE values for nonanomalous 16S sequences at a given interval of global sequence divergence was computed a priori by performing an all-vs. The DE value computed from the query and reference sequence comparison was compared with the distribution of known reference DE values at that global sequence divergence, and if it exceeded the 99 th percentile of known values, it was flagged as a potential anomalous sequence.

All overlapping 50 mers Kmers of length 50 were extracted from each of the reference sequences in the database corresponding to those sequences with validated taxonomic predictions and those used for synthetic chimera construction as described earlier. Those Kmers that were identified as unique to a genus were cataloged as genus-specific Kmers.

Given a query sequence, all overlapping 50 mers were examined and those matching taxon-specific Kmers were identified. Detection of chimeric 16S sequences by CS occurred in several stages outlined below:. Search query sequence termini to identify nearest neighbors.

The top 15 matches from each search were extracted in NAST format. Identification of chimera parent candidates. Potential parents of a candidate chimeric sequence were identified such that an in silico chimera among multiple parent reference 16S sequences existed that had a higher scoring pairwise alignment to the query than did any individual 16S reference sequence across the length of the entire alignment. In the context of the existing NAST multiple alignment of reference sequences chosen above in step 1, the highest-scoring alignment of the query to reference sequences allowing for multiple breakpoints chimerization events was computed.

F i , j corresponds to the maximum alignment score between the query and reference sequence i between NAST alignment positions To minimize overzealous branching of the alignments which, given a low breakpoint penalty, could occur to circumvent most mismatches in the alignment , the breakpoint penalty was computed at runtime as described below.

CS used the concept of a minimum divergence ratio minDivR , computed as the minimum value of the percent identity between a query sequence and putative chimera C divided by the percent identity between the query Q and either of the parents P 1 or P 2 :. The default value of 1. With culture-independent approaches for analyses of microbial diversity picking up fast with high throughput sequencing methods, the amount of chimeric sequences being published in the databases are also increasing exponentially.

This is the era of Metagenomics or simply put community DNA analyses where DNA from thousands of species gets pooled up and is then analysed. This further increases chances of chimera formation.

Chimeras are usually formed during polymerase chain reaction PCRs but in some rare cases they are for real. Therefore, it becomes relevant to adopt methods which can clean the sequence datasets of Chimeras. Recently, a number of chimera detecting software for 16S rRNA gene sequences have been launched namely Pintail, Mallard and Bellerophon. Pintail and Mallard can detect chimeras and anomalies in the 16S rRNA genes based on extent of pair-wise percentage similarity between the query and related sequences.

In chimera analysis by Pintail 1. As Pintail is a one-on-one query-subject comparison, it is highly stringent. This is not the case with Mallard. In Mallard, one of the sequences from within a dataset of query sequences is randomly chosen as subject, while rest remain as query.

Accurate representations of biological diversity are not possible with data containing chimeras and other artifacts. The entire community must work together to prevent these artifact sequences from polluting the public databases.

National Center for Biotechnology Information , U.